Stakeholders at a roundtable on the implementation of the International Cargo Tracking Note (ICTN) agreed on its benefits but remained divided on how it should be executed.
The discussion, organized by the Maritime Association of Nigeria (MARAN), focused on the controversies surrounding the ICTN rollout. While some backed the government’s implementation plan, others argued for a different approach, citing legal and procedural concerns.
Representing the Comptroller General of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Assistant Comptroller General (ACG) Charles Orbih assured stakeholders that ICTN costs would be offset by reduced delays, demurrage fees, and improved efficiency.
In a paper titled “Proposed Cargo Tracking Note: A Second Look by Critical Stakeholders,” the Customs boss referenced Section 28 of the Nigeria Customs Service Act, 2023, which empowers the service to develop and maintain electronic cargo tracking systems. He emphasized a phased rollout, with ongoing stakeholder engagement to ensure minimal disruption.
Adeniyi also highlighted global evidence supporting ICTN’s effectiveness in reducing cargo theft and loss. He stressed that rather than adding bureaucracy, the system would integrate with existing processes to streamline trade and enhance security.
“The goal is not just adopting new technology but improving Nigeria’s maritime trade efficiency. A successful ICTN implementation will make our ports more transparent, competitive, and globally relevant,” he stated.
Pius Akutah, Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Shippers’ Council (NSC), noted that ICTN is a cargo facilitation initiative involving the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and Customs. He assured that the council aimed to minimize costs, emphasizing that ICTN was not designed as a revenue-generating tool.
However, critics raised strong objections. Lucky Amiwero, President of the National Council of Managing Directors of Licensed Customs Agents (NCMDLCA), argued that ICTN lacks legal backing and is not recognized under any international convention.
Similarly, Dr. Segun Musa, Chairman of Widescope International Logistics, dismissed ICTN as an “intellectual fraud,” asserting that it duplicates existing Customs processes such as advance manifests and 100% cargo examination. He warned that it could obstruct cargo clearance and create opportunities for exploitation.
Despite resistance, some stakeholders pointed to ICTN’s adoption by 32 African nations, arguing that Nigeria should follow suit. Dr. Eugene Nweke of the Sea Empowerment and Research Center (SEREC) advocated for its implementation to strengthen cargo tracking and regulatory oversight.
READ ALSO: Vice President Approves Desk Offices for Islamic Banks in State Pilgrims Welfare Boards
NAHCON Appoints Dr. Mustapha Muhammad as New Secretary
MARAN President Godfrey Bivbere reiterated ICTN’s potential benefits, including enhanced cargo monitoring and increased government revenue.
“The system has the capacity to generate billions in revenue from areas currently unaccounted for at our borders,” he noted.
While ICTN’s security and efficiency benefits are widely acknowledged, its implementation remains contentious. As discussions continue, stakeholders will need to balance trade facilitation with regulatory transparency to ensure an effective rollout.
